Why the study?
The study aimed to compare hospitalization and mortality rates of primary care referrals to cardiology for ambulatory heart failure care across three periods: before, during electronic consultation implementation, and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Does a clinician-to-clinician e-consult program reduce hospital admissions and mortality in heart failure patients referred to cardiology?
Does a clinician-to-clinician e-consult program reduce hospital admissions and mortality in heart failure patients referred to cardiology?
Implementation of a clinician-to-clinician e-consult program for heart failure referrals significantly reduced waiting times, hospital admissions, and mortality rates, with benefits persisting during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
e-Consults were associated with fewer HF hospitalizations; leaves open whether this extends to mortality or warrants practice change.
Objectives:To compare the health outcomes, specifically hospitalization and mortality rates, of primary care physicians’ referrals to the cardiology department for ambulatory assistance in heart failure (HF) over three clearly defined periods: before, during the electronic consultation program implementation (e-consult), and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods:Between 2010 and 2021, 6,859 HF patients were referred at least once. Of these, 4,851 received e-consultations, and 2,008 underwent single-act consultations. A time series regression model was used to analyze the impact of e-consult implementation (started in 2013) on all-cause, cardiovascular (CV), and HF-related hospital admissions and mortality rates. Results:e-Consults reduced the waiting time for cardiology care to 9 days. Hospital admissions decreased significantly after the implementation of e-consult (relative risk incidence [RRi] [95% confidence interval {CI95%}]: 0.867 [0.875–0.838] for HF, 0.838 [0.825–0.856] for cardiovascular disease, and 0.639 [0.635–0.651] for all-cause diseases), and mortality decreased (RRi [CI95%]: 0.981 [0.977–0.983] for HF, 0.977 [0.970–0.980] for CV, and 0.985 [0.984–0.985] for all causes). These improvements persisted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions:The implementation of the e-consult program for managing HF patient referrals resulted in reduced waiting times for cardiology care and decreases in hospitalizations and mortality rates. These benefits were maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cinza‐Sanjurjo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: