Key result
A machine-learning algorithm estimated cardiac electrical activation times from motion imaging with an error of ~10 ms for ischemic and ~20 ms for nonischemic patients compared to invasive mapping.
Why the study?
Does a machine-learning algorithm applied to cardiac motion imaging accurately estimate cardiac electrophysiological activation patterns compared to invasive mapping?
Does a machine-learning algorithm applied to cardiac motion imaging accurately estimate cardiac electrophysiological activation patterns compared to invasive mapping?
Machine learning applied to cardiac motion imaging can noninvasively estimate cardiac electrophysiological activation patterns with relatively small error compared to invasive mapping.
May support noninvasive activation mapping; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
While abnormal patterns of cardiac electrophysiological activation are at the origin of important cardiovascular diseases (e.g., arrhythmia, asynchrony), the only clinically available method to observe detailed left ventricular endocardial surface activation pattern is through invasive catheter mapping. However, this electrophysiological activation controls the onset of the mechanical contraction; therefore, important information about the electrophysiology could be deduced from the detailed observation of the resulting motion patterns. In this paper, we present the study of this inverse cardiac electrokinematic relationship. The objective is to predict the activation pattern knowing the cardiac motion from the analysis of cardiac image sequences. To achieve this, we propose to create a rich patient-specific database of synthetic time series of the cardiac images using simulations of a personalized cardiac electromechanical model, in order to study this complex relationship between electrical activity and kinematic patterns in the context of this specific patient. We use this database to train a machine-learning algorithm which estimates the depolarization times of each cardiac segment from global and regional kinematic descriptors based on displacements or strains and their derivatives. Finally, we use this learning to estimate the patient’s electrical activation times using the acquired clinical images. Experiments on the inverse electrokinematic learning are demonstrated on synthetic sequences and are evaluated on clinical data with promising results. The error calculated between our prediction and the invasive intracardiac mapping ground truth is relatively small (around 10 ms for ischemic patients and 20 ms for nonischemic patient). This approach suggests the possibility of noninvasive electrophysiological pattern estimation using cardiac motion imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prakosa et al. (2013) studied Abnormal cardiac electrophysiological activation. Machine-learning algorithm for electrophysiological pattern estimation from cardiac motion imaging vs. Invasive intracardiac mapping was evaluated on Error between predicted activation times and invasive intracardiac mapping ground truth. A machine-learning algorithm estimated cardiac electrical activation times from motion imaging with an error of ~10 ms for ischemic and ~20 ms for nonischemic patients compared to invasive mapping.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: