Why the study?
The effect of metabolic syndrome on carotid stiffness in the context of gender remains under research.
Does metabolic syndrome affect carotid artery stiffness differently in men and women?
Does metabolic syndrome affect carotid artery stiffness differently in men and women?
Metabolic syndrome is associated with increased carotid artery stiffness, with a stronger and more significant relationship observed in women compared to men.
May indicate stronger metabolic syndrome effects on carotid stiffness in women; leaves open prospective validation before clinical consideration.
INTRODUCTION: The effect of metabolic syndrome (MS) on carotid stiffness (CS) in the context of gender is under research. OBJECTIVE: We examined the relationship between the MS and CS in men (M) and women (W) and investigated if the impact of cardiovascular risk factors on CS is modulated by gender. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 419 subjects (mean age 54.3 years): 215 (51%) with MS (109 W and 106 M) and 204 (49%) without MS (98 W and 106 M). Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and CS parameters (beta stiffness index (beta), Peterson's elastic modulus (Ep), arterial compliance (AC) and one-point pulse wave velocity (PWV-beta)) were measured with the echo-tracking (eT) system. RESULTS: ANCOVA demonstrated that MS was associated with elevated CS indices (p = 0.003 for beta and 0.025 for PWV-beta), although further sex-specific analysis revealed that this relationship was significant only in W (p = 0.021 for beta). Age was associated with CS in both M and W, pulse pressure (PP) and body mass index turned out to be determinants of CS solely in W, while the effect of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate was more pronounced in M. MANOVA performed in subjects with MS revealed that age and diabetes mellitus type 2 were determinants of CS in both sexes, diastolic blood pressure and MAP - solely in M and systolic blood pressure, PP and waist circumference - solely in W (the relationship between the waist circumference and AC was paradoxical). CONCLUSION: The relationship between MS and CS is stronger in W than in M. In subjects with MS, various components of arterial pressure exert different sex-specific effects on CS - with the impact of the pulsative component of arterial pressure (PP) observed in W and the impact of the steady component (MAP) observed in M.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kruszyńska et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: