Key result
In 13 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, xamoterol improved symptom scores and controlled exercise heart rate better than digoxin or placebo.
Why the study?
Does xamoterol improve symptom scores and heart rate control compared to digoxin or placebo in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=13)
blind
crossover
Does xamoterol improve symptom scores and heart rate control compared to digoxin or placebo in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?
In patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, xamoterol provides superior symptomatic and chronotropic control compared to digoxin by modulating heart rate according to sympathetic activity.
Supports xamoterol over digoxin for symptom relief in chronic AF; extends options for sympathetic-modulated rate control.
Thirteen patients in chronic atrial fibrillation with a normal resting heart rate but with exercise tachycardia and episodes of bradycardia were randomised to treatment periods of two weeks on xamoterol (200 mg twice daily), low dose digoxin, or placebo, in a blind crossover study. The results (mean SEM) of symptom scores, a treadmill exercise test, and 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring were obtained. Xamoterol improved symptom scores and controlled exercise heart rate better than digoxin. Xamoterol was better than digoxin or placebo in reducing the heart rate response to exercise and tended to improve exercise duration. Xamoterol, by reducing the daytime maximum hourly heart rate and increasing the night time minimum hourly heart rate, significantly reduced the difference between the two compared with placebo. In contrast, digoxin tended to reduce both the maximum and minimum hourly heart rates through day and night. Both the frequency and duration of ventricular pauses were reduced by xamoterol but tended to increase with digoxin. Xamoterol reduced both the circadian variation in ventricular response to atrial fibrillation and exercise tachycardia by modulating the heart rate according to the prevailing level of sympathetic activity. These changes were translated into symptomatic benefit for the patients studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ang et al. (1990) conducted an RCT in chronic atrial fibrillation (n=13). xamoterol vs. low dose digoxin or placebo was evaluated on symptom scores, treadmill exercise test, and 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. In 13 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, xamoterol improved symptom scores and controlled exercise heart rate better than digoxin or placebo.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: