Why the study?
The study evaluated the effect of discontinuing beta-blockers versus continuous use following myocardial infarction in optimally treated, stable patients without heart failure.
Does discontinuation of beta-blockers increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events or death in stable, optimally treated patients without heart failure following a first-time myocardial infarction?
Does discontinuation of beta-blockers increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events or death in stable, optimally treated patients without heart failure following a first-time myocardial infarction?
Discontinuation of beta-blockers 1 year or later after a myocardial infarction in stable patients without heart failure is not associated with increased serious adverse events.
Supports beta-blocker discontinuation in stable post-MI patients without HF; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm long-term safety.
AIMS: We studied the effect of discontinuing beta-blockers following myocardial infarction in comparison to continuous beta-blocker use in optimally treated, stable patients without heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationwide registers, we identified first-time myocardial infarction patients treated with beta-blockers following percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary angiography. The analysis was based on landmarks selected as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after the first redeemed beta-blocker prescription date. The outcomes included all-cause death, cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and a composite outcome of cardiovascular events and procedures. We used logistic regression and reported standardized absolute 5-year risks and risk differences at each landmark year. Among 21 220 first-time myocardial infarction patients, beta-blocker discontinuation was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, or recurrent myocardial infarction compared with patients continuing beta-blockers (landmark year 5; absolute risk difference [95% confidence interval]), correspondingly; -4.19% [-8.95%; 0.57%], -1.18% [-4.11%; 1.75%], and -0.37% [-4.56%; 3.82%]). Further, beta-blocker discontinuation within 2 years after myocardial infarction was associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome (landmark year 2; absolute risk [95% confidence interval] 19.87% [17.29%; 22.46%]) compared with continued beta-blocker use (landmark year 2; absolute risk [95% confidence interval] 17.10% [16.34%; 17.87%]), which yielded an absolute risk difference [95% confidence interval] at -2.8% [-5.4%; -0.1%], however, there was no risk difference associated with discontinuation hereafter. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of beta-blockers 1 year or later after a myocardial infarction without heart failure was not associated with increased serious adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halili et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: