Why the study?
American Indian peoples have high smoking rates and cardiovascular risk factor burden, prompting investigation into latent smoking trajectories and cardiovascular risk.
How do latent smoking classes across adolescence and adulthood relate to adult cardiovascular risk among American Indian peoples?
How do latent smoking classes across adolescence and adulthood relate to adult cardiovascular risk among American Indian peoples?
Smoking trajectories from adolescence to adulthood are associated with increased cardiovascular risk markers (CRP, lipids) in American Indian peoples, highlighting the need for early socioecologically informed interventions.
Supports early smoking prevention focus in American Indian youth; extends prior associations to this population but remains hypothesis-generating.
OBJECTIVE: American Indian peoples (AIs) have high smoking rates and cardiovascular risk factor burden. The present study aimed to (a) investigate latent smoking classes across adolescence and adulthood, (b) investigate adolescent predictors of smoking classes, and (c) assess how smoking class is related to adult cardiovascular risk in a sample of AIs. METHOD: = 338) from the National Adolescent to Adult Health Study self-reported on smoking across four assessment waves (W1: 7th-12th grade; W2: 8th-12th grade; W3: ages 18-26; W4: ages 24-32). The socioecological framework for addressing tobacco-related disparities was used to identify potential adolescent (W1) risk and resource factors. C-reactive protein, blood pressure, and lipids were collected at W4. Growth mixture modeling and regressions were used. RESULTS: class was associated with higher C-reactive protein and less favorable lipid levels. W1 social support was a resource factor for adult diastolic blood pressure and some lipids. CONCLUSIONS: Socioecologically informed tobacco interventions have the potential to reduce smoking and cardiovascular risk among AIs, and bolstering social support may be important. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clawson et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: