Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In quantitative coronary angiography, the absolute diameters of coronary artery lumina are obtained by using a catheter as a scaling device. METHODS: We examined the effect of x-ray opacity on the accuracy of calibration methods that use such catheters by varying the concentration of contrast medium in the catheters in phantom experiments with a digital cine imaging system. RESULTS: With contrast-filled, currently available catheters, the average increase in the measured calibration factor from the gold standard (as determined by using a measuring scale) was 1.0% and 0.4% in the 13-cm and 17-cm image-intensifier modes, respectively, compared with -9.9% and -12.4% for catheters without contrast medium. The corresponding figures for catheters of the previous generation that lacked contrast medium were 1.0% and 0.4%, respectively. The image contrast of previous-generation catheters filled with saline was closer to that of current-generation catheters filled with contrast medium than that of current-generation catheters filled with saline. CONCLUSIONS: When used for quantitative coronary angiography by digital angiography, currently available low-radiopacity catheters give more accurate data when filled with contrast medium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tadehara et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: