Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This collaborative autoethnography (CAE) by five emerging disaster researchers explores the transformative role of Bourdieu's theories in the realm of disaster research. Despite the rapid expansion of disaster scholarship since the late 1970s, the field's theoretical foundations and frameworks have been relatively underdeveloped. The authors, united by their engagement with Bourdieu's work in their doctoral research, reflect on how his theories shaped their journeys into Critical Disaster Studies (CDS) scholars and propelled the advancement of disaster theories. The paper navigates the ambiguity and richness of Bourdieu's concepts, illustrating how they are used beyond their original domains to find relevance in contemporary disaster research. Each author shares their unique pathway for encountering and applying Bourdieu's theories, revealing a diverse spectrum of applications, from understanding symbolic violence in disaster contexts to analysing social vulnerability and resilience. Through this shared dedication, the authors aim to expand the horizon of social science disaster research and inspire others, especially early career researchers (ECRs), to engage profoundly with Bourdieu's contribution to the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uekusa et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: