Why the study?
Multiple simultaneous activation wavefronts initiated by the His-Purkinje system complicate iECG, but previous multi-focal iECG does not accurately mimic this effect.
Does multi-wave iECG improve the accuracy of non-invasive estimation of ventricular activation compared to multi-focal iECG in patients undergoing electro-anatomical mapping?
Population
Four patients undergoing invasive electro-anatomical mapping during normal ventricular activation
Comparison
Multi-wave iECG vs multi-focal iECG
Design
Comparative validation study
Authors
Loading...
Hypothesis-generating for multi-wave iECG in non-invasive ventricular mapping; prospective validation required before clinical adoption.
Does multi-wave iECG improve the accuracy of non-invasive estimation of ventricular activation compared to multi-focal iECG in patients undergoing electro-anatomical mapping?
Modeling the His-Purkinje system using multi-wave iECG provides a more physiologically realistic and accurate non-invasive estimation of normal ventricular activation compared to multi-focal iECG.
Boonstra et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: