Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Why do firms outsource research and development (R&D) for some products while conducting R&D in-house for similar ones? An innovating firm risks cannibalizing its existing products. The more profitable these products, the more the firm wants to limit cannibalization. We apply this logic to the organization of R&D by introducing a novel theoretical model in which developing in-house provides the firm more control over the new product's location in product space. An empirical analysis of our testable predictions using pharmaceutical data concerning patents, patent expiration, and outsourcing at various stages of the R&D process supports our theoretical approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jungbauer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: