Key result
New nomogram outperforms STOP-Bang score for predicting OSA in women with ~0.82 AUC.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to develop a noninvasive clinical diagnostic model based on clinical markers for obstructive sleep apnea and verify its predictive efficacy in female patients.
Does a nomogram predictive model based on clinical markers improve the prediction of obstructive sleep apnea compared to the STOP-Bang score in female patients?
Observational (n=317)
No
Does a nomogram predictive model based on clinical markers improve the prediction of obstructive sleep apnea compared to the STOP-Bang score in female patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.815% vs 0.797%
A novel nomogram predictive model incorporating age, snoring, cerebrovascular disease, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, and insomnia demonstrates superior predictive efficacy for obstructive sleep apnea in female patients compared to the STOP-Bang score.
Nomogram may improve OSA prediction in women; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Objective: To develop a noninvasive clinical diagnostic model based on clinical markers for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and to verify its predictive efficacy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on female patients who underwent diagnostic sleep monitoring and had complete medical records from January 2021 to April 2023 at Zhongshan Hospital affiliated with Fudan University. The risk factors were analyzed using LASSO regression and multivariate Logistic regression to construct a nomogram predictive model and evaluate its performance. Finally, the predictive efficacy of the constructed model was compared with that of the STOP-Bang score. Result: A total of 317 female patients were enrolled. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age (OR = 1.045, 95% CI: 1.02–1.072, p < 0.001), snoring (OR = 8.698, 95% CI: 3.439–24.89, p < 0.001), cerebrovascular disease (OR = 28.15, 95% CI: 2.408–931.7, p = 0.025), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (OR = 1.217, 95% CI: 1.112–1.348, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for OSA in females, while insomnia (OR = 0.125, 95% CI: 0.03–0.423, p = 0.002) served as a protective factor. A nomogram predictive model was constructed using the aforementioned independent predictors, exhibiting good discrimination with a C-index of 0.881 (95% CI: 0.84–0.93) in the training cohort and 0.815 (95% CI: 0.73–0.90) in the validation cohort. Comparing the model’s area under the curve with that of the STOP-Bang score, the model’s predictive efficacy was found to be superior to the STOP-Bang score. Conclusions: The nomogram predictive model demonstrates good accuracy, consistency, and clinical utility. It aids doctors in the early identification of high-risk female patients with OSA in clinical practice, enabling timely preventive and interventional measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Obstructive sleep apnea (n=317). Nomogram predictive model vs. STOP-Bang questionnaire was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) for predicting OSA in the validation cohort (95% CI 0.73-0.90). A nomogram predictive model identified obstructive sleep apnea in female patients with an AUC of 0.815 in the validation cohort, outperforming the STOP-Bang score's AUC of 0.797.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: