This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A traditional two-section watch bill (6 hours on / 6 hours off, starting at midnight – “6/6”) and a two-section watch bill better adapted to the human circadian rhythm (watches of 7, 5, 5, and 7 hours duration, starting at 3 a.m. – “7-5-5-7”) were trialed on two vessels of the German Navy with 67 study participants in a crossover design. Questionnaires were used to assess subjective sleepiness (ESS, KSS) and subjective fatigue (FSS). The psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) was self-administered with wearable devices before and after each watch. Over the course of seven days at sea, PVT performance worsened significantly with the 6/6, but not with the 7-5-5-7 watch bill. In the 6/6 watch bill, number of participants with excessive sleepiness and high levels of fatigue was higher than in the 7-5-5-7 watch bill although not at a statistically significant level. Marked differences between watch bills in crew performance started to emerge after 6 days.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Röttger et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: