Why the study?
Studies evaluating the ability of exercise to drive coronary collateral development in humans are inconsistent, possibly due to heterogeneous assessment methods.
Does exercise training improve the development of coronary collaterals in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Does exercise training improve the development of coronary collaterals in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
This review highlights the theoretical potential of exercise to enhance coronary collateral circulation in stable CAD, while noting that current clinical evidence remains inconsistent.
Exercise should not yet target collaterals in stable CAD; leaves open whether standardized methods can resolve inconsistencies in future trials.
Coronary collateral vessels supply blood to areas of myocardium at risk after arterial occlusion. Flow through these channels is driven by a pressure gradient between the donor and the occluded artery. Concomitant with increased collateral flow is an increase in shear force, a potent stimulus for collateral development (arteriogenesis). Arteriogenesis is self-limiting, often ceasing prematurely when the pressure gradient is reduced by the expanding lumen of the collateral vessel. After the collateral has reached its self-limited maximal conductance, the only way to drive further increases is to re-establish the pressure gradient. During exercise, the myocardial oxygen demand is increased, subsequently increasing coronary flow. Therefore, exercise may represent a means of driving augmented arteriogenesis in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Studies investigating the ability of exercise to drive collateral development in humans are inconsistent. However, these inconsistencies may be due to the heterogeneity of assessment methods used to quantify change. This article summarises current evidence pertaining to the role of exercise in the development of coronary collaterals, highlighting areas of future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nickolay et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: