Why the study?
Does the higher use of invasive cardiac procedures in the United States compared to Canada improve long-term survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Population
233,702 elderly patients with a new acute myocardial infarction in 1991
Comparison
United States healthcare system management vs Canadian healthcare system management
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
1 year
Authors
Loading...
Similar mortality despite markedly higher US procedural rates; leaves open whether routine invasive management improves outcomes in elderly AMI.
Does the higher use of invasive cardiac procedures in the United States compared to Canada improve long-term survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Strikingly higher rates of invasive cardiac procedures in the US compared to Canada for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction do not result in better 1-year survival.
Tu et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: