Key result
US same-day PCI rates for older AMI patients reach ~22%, closing the historical gap with Ontario.
Why the study?
Previous work showed lower cardiac intervention rates for AMI in Ontario than in the US, and it was unknown whether Ontario's efforts to improve rapid PCI access improved timeliness and closed this gap.
Does the healthcare system (US vs Ontario) affect the rate of timely cardiac interventions in older patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=526,700)
Yes
Does the healthcare system (US vs Ontario) affect the rate of timely cardiac interventions in older patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Historical disparities in timely PCI for AMI between the US and Ontario largely disappeared by 2013, though the US maintained higher early intervention rates for high-risk STEMI patients.
BACKGROUND: Previous work showed lower cardiac intervention rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Ontario than in the United States. We assessed whether Ontario's efforts to improve access to rapid percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AMI were associated with improved timeliness of care and whether this closed the gap between the 2 jurisdictions. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we followed adults aged 66-99 years in the US and Ontario for 30 days after admission for incident AMI between 2003 and 2013 using health administrative data from both countries. We calculated the proportion of patients who received cardiac catheterization, PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting on the day of and within 30 days of admission overall and according to AMI type (ST-segment elevation AMI [STEMI] v. non-STEMI) and risk group (low, medium or high predicted risk of 30-d mortality). RESULTS: We followed 414 216 patients in the US and 112 484 in Ontario. The large disparities in cardiac intervention rates observed in 2003 mostly disappeared over time. By 2013, the proportion of patients who received same-day PCI was only slightly higher in the US than in Ontario (22.3% v. 19.2%), whereas the converse was true for 30-day PCI (44.0% v. 41.3%). In 2013, patients with STEMI in the US and Ontario received PCI at nearly identical rates on the day of admission (66.3% v. 63.8%); however, more patients at high risk with STEMI in the US than in Ontario received PCI, both on the day of admission (55.5% v. 44.7%) and by 30 days (60.5% v. 55.0%). INTERPRETATION: Despite differences in resources and organization of delivery systems, by 2013, timely receipt of PCI by Ontario patients with AMI lagged only slightly behind that by US patients. A higher supply of PCI centres in the US may have facilitated earlier intervention among patients at high risk with STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasaitis et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=526,700). US healthcare system vs. Ontario healthcare system was evaluated on Same-day PCI in 2013.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: