Why the study?
To measure the efficacy of regional expansion of a primary PCI program implemented in an east Toronto hospital to improve access for STEMI patients.
Does paramedic-initiated referral reduce door-to-balloon time for primary PCI in STEMI patients compared to walk-ins or inter-hospital transfers?
Observational (n=101)
No
Does paramedic-initiated referral reduce door-to-balloon time for primary PCI in STEMI patients compared to walk-ins or inter-hospital transfers?
Absolute Event Rate: 89.5% vs 120.9%
p-value: p=0.047
Paramedic-initiated referral for STEMI significantly reduces door-to-balloon times compared to ED walk-ins or inter-hospital transfers, supporting the expansion of EMS-hospital partnerships.
Background ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains the second leading cause of death in Canada. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been recognized as an effective method for treating STEMI. Improved access to primary PCI can be achieved through the implementation of regional PCI centres, which was the impetus for implementing the PCI program in an east Toronto hospital in 2009. As such, the purpose of this study was to measure the efficacy of this program regional expansion. Methods A retrospective review of 101 patients diagnosed with STEMI from May to Sept 2010 was conducted. The average door-to-balloon time for these STEMI patients was calculated and the door-to-balloon times using different methods of arrival were analyzed. Method of arrival was by one of three ways: paramedic initiated referral; patient walk-ins to PCI centre emergency department; or transfer after walk-in to community hospital emergency department. Results The study found that mean door-to balloon time for PCI was 112.5 minutes. When the door-to-balloon times were compared across the three arrival methods, patients who presented by paramedic-initiated referral had significantly shorter door-to-balloon times, (89.5 minutes) relative to those transferred (120.9 minutes) and those who walked into a PCI centre (126.7 minutes) (p = 0.047). Conclusions The findings suggest that the partnership between the hospital and its EMS partners should be continued, and paramedic initiated referral should be expanded across Canada and EMS systems where feasible, as this level of coverage does not currently exist nationwide. Investments in regional centres of excellence and the creation of EMS partnerships are needed to enhance access to primary PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nippak et al. (2021) conducted an observational in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=101). Paramedic-initiated referral vs. Transfer from community hospital or walk-in to PCI centre was evaluated on Door-to-balloon time (p=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: