Why the study?
Continued categorization by race in physiological research suggests inherent differences rather than addressing underlying factors causing health disparities, prompting a reconsideration of race categorization and recommendations for investigating group disparities.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Perspectives article
Supports reevaluating race-based assumptions in cardiovascular research; hypothesis-generating for studies targeting social and environmental drivers.
Racial disparities in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health outcomes are well described, and recent research has shed light on the mechanistic underpinnings of those disparities. However, "race" is a social construct that is poorly defined and continually evolving and is historically based on faulty premises. The continued categorization by race in physiological research suggests that there are inherent differences between races, rather than addressing the specific underlying factors that result in health disparities between groups. The purpose of this Perspectives article is to provide a brief history of the genesis of categorization by race, why such categorization should be reconsidered in physiology research, and offer recommendations to more directly investigate the underlying factors that result in group disparities in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolf et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: