Why the study?
Clinical equipoise exists regarding whether hyperoxia causes myocardial injury in both acute ischaemic insults and stable myocardium.
Does hyperbaric oxygen treatment induce myocardial injury as measured by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients treated for non-cardiac pathologies?
Does hyperbaric oxygen treatment induce myocardial injury as measured by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients treated for non-cardiac pathologies?
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy does not cause biochemical myocardial injury, supporting its cardiac safety in patients treated for non-cardiac conditions.
Supports myocardial safety of hyperbaric oxygen in non-cardiac patients; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
Introduction: There is clinical equipoise as to whether hyperoxia is injurious to the myocardium, both in the setting of acute ischaemic insults and on the stable myocardium. This study examined the effect of extreme hyperoxia - in the form of hyperbaric oxygen treatment - on the myocardium through measurement of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. Methods: Forty-eight individuals were enrolled to undergo a series of 30 exposures to hyperbaric oxygen for treatment of non-cardiac pathologies. High-sensitivity troponin T was measured before and after each session. Results: There was no clinically significant difference in troponin measurements following acute or recurrent sequential exposures to extreme hyperoxia, despite the studied patient population having a high rate of previous ischaemic heart disease or cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that profound hyperoxaemia does not induce any measurable cardiac injury at a biochemical level. Neither is there a reduction in cardiac troponin to suggest a cardioprotective effect of hyperbaric hyperoxia. This provides some reassurance as to the cardiac safety of the routine use of hyperbaric oxygen treatment in management of non-cardiac pathology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marjot et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: