Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A national poll and a content analysis of network newscasts examined if coverage of foreign nations had an agenda-setting influence. The more media coverage a nation received, the more likely respondents were to think the nation was vitally important to U.S. interests, supporting the agenda-setting hypothesis. The more negative coverage a nation received, the more likely respondents were to think negatively about the nation, supporting the second level of agenda setting. Positive coverage of a nation had no influence on public perceptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wanta et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: