Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When the process of publication favors studies with small p -values, and hence large effect estimates, combined estimates from many studies may be biased. This paper describes a model for estimation of effect size when there is selection based on one-tailed p -values. The model employs the method of maximum likelihood in the context of a mixed (fixed and random) effects general linear model for effect sizes. It offers a test for the presence of publication bias, and corrected estimates of the parameters of the linear model for effect magnitude. The model is illustrated using a well-known data set on the benefits of psychotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vevea et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: