Key result
Disability linked to ~437% higher CVD prevalence among US law enforcement workers.
Why the study?
Law enforcement workers face a higher risk of CVD, but employment factors impacting CVD remain systematically understudied, particularly in a national US sample.
Are specific employment factors associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease in US law enforcement workers?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,177)
Yes
Are specific employment factors associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease in US law enforcement workers?
Effect estimate: OR 5.37 (95% CI 2.53-11.38)
Employment factors such as disability, retirement, department size, and tenure are associated with higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease among US law enforcement workers.
May inform occupational CVD screening among law enforcement workers; leaves open causality and generalizability.
BACKGROUND: Law enforcement workers face a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), however, employment factors impacting CVD remain systematically understudied, particularly in a national US sample. We describe temporal trends in prevalent CVD including coronary heart disease (CHD), angina, myocardial infarction (MI) and other heart disease; and investigate associations of select employment factors with CVD among law enforcement workers using the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) from 2006 to 2018. METHODS: We analyzed prevalent CVD in law enforcement workers employed in local, state, and federal establishments using the NHIS, a nationally representative sample of US workers. We estimated odds ratios (OR [95% confidence interval, CI]) of CVD in relation to employment factors using survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic and traditional CVD risk factors. RESULTS: Among 2177 law enforcement workers, mean age 46 years, 19% female, prevalence of CVD was higher among disabled (OR = 5.37; 95% CI: 2.53, 11.38 for aggregate CVD outcome) and retired (OR = 2.14; 95% CI: 1.18, 3.88 for aggregate CVD outcome) workers compared to currently employed workers. Workers employed in smaller (1-24 employees) or larger (≥ 500 employees) departments and those with tenure > 20 years also demonstrated higher prevalence odds of select CVD outcomes. Although not statistically significant, higher prevalence odds across CVD outcomes were observed in local government employees, hourly paid workers, and workers with 10-19 years of tenure. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights that select employment factors, some previously underexplored, may be associated with prevalent CVD in law enforcement workers. Leveraging national surveys and worker cohorts to enhance surveillance of identified groups in this high-risk population could help elucidate the role of employment on CVD development and inform workplace interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abasilim et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=2,177). Disabled or retired employment status vs. Currently employed workers was evaluated on Aggregate CVD outcome (OR 5.37, 95% CI 2.53-11.38). Among US law enforcement workers, being disabled (OR 5.37; 95% CI 2.53-11.38) or retired (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.18-3.88) was associated with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: