Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Recently a large amount of research has been devoted to automatic activity analysis. Typically, activities have been defined by their motion characteristics and represented by trajectories. These trajectories are collected and clustered to determine typical behaviors. This paper evaluates different similarity measures and clustering methodologies to catalog their strengths and weaknesses when utilized for the trajectory learning problem. The clustering performance is measured by evaluating the correct clustering rate on different datasets with varying characteristics.
Morris et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: