Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To study community interactions and thus to highlight potential ways to support farmers’ professional transition toward more sustainable agriculture.Methodology: Mixed methods with a questionnaire, interviews, peer-to-peer interactions, and a theoretical framework to analyze drivers of indeterminacy that can trigger a break in farmers’ routines. The study took place in a digital agricultural community.Findings: We highlighted three potential drivers of indeterminacy in a professional transition process like Agroecological Transition (AET), as well as the role of community facilitator.Practical implications: Integrating into farmers’ training and extension services the issues of valuation to discuss how practices and objects are prised and evaluated. This can open a way for new meanings and values that support AET and support a departure from usual standards.Theoretical implications: Applying inquiry theory as an epistemic proposition to examine support for farmers’ professional transitions and their training in relation to their real work situation.Originality: We propose an articulation between the study of a digital platform and the analysis of the drivers of engagement in an agroecological transition process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slimi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: