The low incidence of PE (5%) in young patients undergoing MDCT for suspected PE highlights the need for careful risk-benefit consideration regarding radiation and contrast exposure.
BACKGROUND: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has become the first-line modality for imaging patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). The disadvantages of MDCT, the use of ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast agents, are a reasonable cause of concern, especially in young patients, and therefore it is critical to understand the likelihood of PE in these patients to evaluate a risk benefit analysis. PURPOSE: To calculate the incidence of PE and other chest findings on MDCT in a young adult population investigated for PE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 387 consecutive patients (age 31.5+/-13.5 years) underwent chest MDCT for clinically suspected PE between January 2004 and August 2006. Incidence of PE and other chest findings were calculated with a confidence interval of 95% using binomial distribution. RESULTS: PE incidence was 5%; negative PE with other chest findings was 60%. In 89% of the patients with other chest findings, these included findings of the pleura and/or lung parenchyma. The main patterns of disease were lung opacification suggesting pneumonia (41%), atelectasis (12.4%), and nodular/mass findings (17.5%). In 34% of the patients, there was no PE and no other findings present. CONCLUSION: There is a low incidence of PE in young patients imaged for PE with MDCT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herédia et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: