Preclinical study reveals combined EZH2 and tyrosine kinase inhibition targets leukemic stem cells in chronic myeloid leukemia, suggesting an epigenetic strategy to overcome drug resistance.
Supplementary Figure S1. mRNA levels of PRC2 components in CML and normal samples used in this study. Supplementary Figure S2. Effect of TKI treatment on mRNA levels of PRC2 components on CML cells in vitro. Supplementary Figure S3. Analysis of promoters reprogrammed for H3K27me3 levels at promoters. Supplementary Figure S4. Relationship between changes in levels of H3K27me3 and changes in mRNA expression at H3K27me3 targets. Supplementary Figure S5. EZH2i treatment of CML and normal CD34+ cells. Supplementary Figure S6. EZH2i treatment of CML CD34+CD38- cells (LSCs). Supplementary Figure S7. Validation of EZH2 shRNAs in a CML cell line. Supplementary Figure S8. The effect of treatment of CML or normal CD34+ cells with EZH2i (GSK343; 1000 nM) on the global mRNA levels of H3K27me3 and H3K27me1 targets. Supplementary Figure S9. Both imatinib and EZH2i selectively target upregulation of H3K27me3 target genes. Supplementary Figure S10. Nilotinib, dasatinib and EZH2i selectively target upregulation of H3K27me3 target genes. Supplementary Figure S11. mRNA expression levels for H3K27me3 target genes in HSC and LSCs and their behaviour after TKI treatment. Supplementary Figure S12. mRNA expression levels for H3K27me3 target genes in HPC and LPCs (â‰^ CML CD34+) and their behaviour after EZH2i treatment. Supplementary Figure S13. Primary CML cells engrafted in NSG mice treated in vivo with EZH2i and TKI, alone and in combination. Supplementary Figure S14. Validation of mRNA expression changes determined by Affymetrix GeneChip analysis (E-MTAB-2581, Affymetrix HuGe 1.0 ST). Supplementary Figure S15. PRC2 mis-regulation in the three CML patient samples used for Affymetrix GeneChIP and ChIP-sequencing in this study. Supplementary Figure S16. Determining thresholds for identifying H3K27me3 target genes. Supplementary Figure S17. Validation of seqMiner(3) promoter classifications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scott et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: