Key result
Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio showed similar associations with incident diabetes, with pooled relative risks of 1.87, 1.87, and 1.88 per standard deviation increase.
Why the study?
Do body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio have different associations with incident diabetes?
Population
32 published studies from 1966 to 2004 evaluating incident diabetes
Comparison
Body mass index, waist circumference, and… vs Comparison among the three obesity indicators
Design
Meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
Similar associations support BMI alone for diabetes risk prediction; leaves open whether central measures add value in subgroups.
Meta-Analysis
Do body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio have different associations with incident diabetes?
Effect estimate: RR 1.87 (BMI), RR 1.87 (WC), RR 1.88 (WHR) (95% CI 1.67-2.10 (BMI), 1.58-2.20 (WC), 1.61-2.19 (WHR))
Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio have similar associations with incident diabetes, suggesting no clear predictive advantage of central over general obesity indicators.
Vázquez et al. (2007) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 diabetes. Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio was evaluated on Incident diabetes (RR 1.87 (BMI), RR 1.87 (WC), RR 1.88 (WHR), 95% CI 1.67-2.10 (BMI), 1.58-2.20 (WC), 1.61-2.19 (WHR)). Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio showed similar associations with incident diabetes, with pooled relative risks of 1.87, 1.87, and 1.88 per standard deviation increase.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: