Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 2, 2007Epidemiologic ReviewsOpen Access

Comparison of Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, and Waist/Hip Ratio in Predicting Incident Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio showed similar associations with incident diabetes, with pooled relative risks of 1.87, 1.87, and 1.88 per standard deviation increase.

Why the study?

Do body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio have different associations with incident diabetes?

Population

32 published studies from 1966 to 2004 evaluating incident diabetes

Comparison

Body mass index, waist circumference, and… vs Comparison among the three obesity indicators

Design

Meta-analysis

Authors

GVGabriela VázquezInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador ZubiránSDSue DuvalVascular MedicineDavid R. JacobsDavid R. JacobsGeneral / Preventive / Lipids

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Similar associations support BMI alone for diabetes risk prediction; leaves open whether central measures add value in subgroups.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis

Structured PICO

Do body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio have different associations with incident diabetes?

P
Population
32 published studies from 1966 to 2004 evaluating incident diabetes
I
Intervention
Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio
C
Comparator
Comparison among the three obesity indicators
O
Outcome
Incident diabeteshard clinical

Main Result

Effect estimate: RR 1.87 (BMI), RR 1.87 (WC), RR 1.88 (WHR) (95% CI 1.67-2.10 (BMI), 1.58-2.20 (WC), 1.61-2.19 (WHR))

Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio have similar associations with incident diabetes, suggesting no clear predictive advantage of central over general obesity indicators.

Cite This Study

Vázquez et al. (2007) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 diabetes. Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio was evaluated on Incident diabetes (RR 1.87 (BMI), RR 1.87 (WC), RR 1.88 (WHR), 95% CI 1.67-2.10 (BMI), 1.58-2.20 (WC), 1.61-2.19 (WHR)). Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio showed similar associations with incident diabetes, with pooled relative risks of 1.87, 1.87, and 1.88 per standard deviation increase.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10c4ca497e609eda645083https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxm008
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Regional distribution of body fat, plasma lipoproteins, and cardiovascular disease.1990 · 1,261 citations
  2. 2Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies1998 · 1,002 citations
  3. 3Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis2002 · 37,607 citations
  4. 4The Influence of Body Fat Distribution on the Incidence of Diabetes Mellitus: 13.5 Years of Follow-up of the Participants in the Study of Men Born in 19131985 · 982 citations