Abstract Introduction Obesity is a metabolic disorder characterized by a complex interplay of genetic predisposition as well as socioeconomic and behavioral influences. This study aims to understand how anthropometric measures predict the risk of metabolic syndrome among individuals with Type 2 DM using BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio. Methodology The retrospective cross-sectional study used medical records of 202 patients being managed for Type 2 DM at Lagos State University Teaching Hospital endocrine clinic within the study period of 3 months. The chi-square test and simple logistic regression were used to explore the association between variables. Results The prevalence of obesity was 77 (38.1%) based on BMI, 139 (68.8%) after waist circumference measurement, 187 (92.6%) Waist to Hip Ratio and 194 (96.0%) Waist to Height Ratio. The differences observed were statistically significant (p = <2.2e-16). Univariate logistic regression found individuals diagnosed more than 20 years before the onset of the study have significantly higher odds of obesity compared to those with a duration ≤ 5 years (OR = 4.21, 95% CI = 1.10 - 20.48, p = 0.04598). The likelihood of developing metabolic syndrome was notably elevated among individuals categorized as overweight or obese based on BMI [ OR = 2.48, 95% CI (1.17 - 5.35), p = 0.018729] , waist circumference, [ OR = 21.08, 95% CI (10.11 - 46.59), p = 4.16e-15] and Waist-to-hip ratio [ OR = 3.60, 95% CI (1.24 - 11.20), p = 0.0201]. However, no statistically significant association was observed using the Waist to Height Ratio. Conclusion Body Mass Index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, and waist-to-hip ratio all provide valuable insights that capture different aspects of body fat distribution. However, BMI and waist circumference were the strongest predictors of metabolic syndrome in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dada et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: