Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates machine-learning algorithms and measures derived from RapidEye satellite imagery and light detection and ranging (lidar) data for geographic object-based image analysis classification of mining and mine reclamation. Support vector machines, random forests, and boosted classification and regression trees classification algorithms were assessed and compared with the k-nearest neighbour (k-NN) classifier. For geographic object-based image analysis classification of mine landscapes, the use of disparate data (i.e. lidar data) improved overall accuracy, whereas the use of complex, object-oriented variables such as object geometry measures, first-order texture, and second-order texture from the grey-level co-occurrence matrix decreased or did not improve the classification accuracy. Support vector machines generally outperformed k-NN and the ensemble tree classifiers when only using the band means. With the incorporation of lidar-descriptive statistics, all four algorithms provided statistically comparable accuracies. K-NN suffered reduced classification accuracy with high-dimensional feature spaces, suggesting that a more complex machine-learning algorithm may be more appropriate when a large number of predictor variables are used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maxwell et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: