Key result
Prompt initiation of remote monitoring within 91 days of cardiac device implantation was associated with greater adjusted survival (HR 1.18) compared to delayed initiation.
Why the study?
Does prompt initiation of remote monitoring improve survival in patients with newly implanted cardiac electronic devices compared to delayed initiation?
Cohort (n=106,027)
Yes
Does prompt initiation of remote monitoring improve survival in patients with newly implanted cardiac electronic devices compared to delayed initiation?
Effect estimate: HR 1.18 (95% CI 1.13-1.22)
Absolute Event Rate: 4023% vs 4679%
p-value: p=<0.001
Prompt initiation of remote monitoring (within 91 days) after CIED implantation is associated with significantly improved survival compared to delayed initiation across all device types.
Should not yet change practice for remote monitoring timing; leaves open survival benefit in randomized trials.
PURPOSE: Guidelines advocate remote monitoring (RM) in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). However, it is not known when RM should be initiated. We hypothesized that prompt initiation of RM (within 91 days of implant) is associated with improved survival compared to delayed initiation. METHODS: This retrospective, national, observational cohort study evaluated patients receiving new implants of market-released St. Jude Medical™ pacemakers (PM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: an "RM Prompt" group, in which RM was initiated within 91 days of implant; and an "RM Delayed" group, in which RM was initiated >91 days but ≤365 days of implant. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The cohort included 106,027 patients followed for a mean of 2.6 ± 0.9 years. Overall, 47,014 (44 %) patients had a PM, 31,889 (30 %) patients had an ICD, 24,005 (23 %) patients had a CRT-D, and 3119 (3 %) patients had a CRT-P. Remote monitoring was initiated promptly (median 4 weeks [IQR 2, 8 weeks]) in 66,070 (62 %) patients; in the other 39,957 (38 %) patients, RM initiation was delayed (median 24 weeks [IQR 18, 34 weeks]). In comparison to delayed initiation, prompt initiation of RM was associated with a lower mortality rate (4023 vs. 4679 per 100,000 patient-years, p < 0.001) and greater adjusted survival (HR 1.18 [95 % CI 1.13-1.22], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data, for the first time, show improved survival in patients enrolled promptly into RM following CIED implantation. This advantage was observed across all CIED device types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mittal et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation (n=106,027). Prompt initiation of remote monitoring (≤91 days of implant) vs. Delayed initiation of remote monitoring (>91 days and ≤365 days of implant) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (per 100,000 patient-years) (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.13-1.22, p=<0.001). Prompt initiation of remote monitoring within 91 days of cardiac device implantation was associated with greater adjusted survival (HR 1.18) compared to delayed initiation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: