Key result
Modern treatment linked to ~33% lower 5-year mortality in stable patients one year post-MI.
Why the study?
While outcomes after MI have improved in recent decades, it was unknown whether this improvement applies to stable patients who remain event-free 1 year after MI.
How have the long-term risks of mortality, cardiovascular events, and bleeding changed over time in stable patients 1 year after a first-time MI?
Cohort (n=82,108)
Yes
How have the long-term risks of mortality, cardiovascular events, and bleeding changed over time in stable patients 1 year after a first-time MI?
Absolute Event Rate: 12.5% vs 18.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Long-term risks of mortality, recurrent MI, and bleeding have significantly decreased over the past two decades in stable patients 1 year post-MI, correlating with increased use of guideline-directed therapies.
Improved survival in stable post-MI patients; extends temporal trend data but leaves causal therapy effects open in observational cohorts.
Aims Outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI) improved during recent decades alongside better risk factor management and implementation of guideline-recommended treatments. However, it is unknown whether this applies to stable patients who are event-free 1 year after MI. Methods and results Using nationwide Danish registries, we included all patients with first-time MI during 2000–17 who survived 1 year free from bleeding and cardiovascular events (n = 82 108, median age 64 years, 68.2% male). Follow-up started 1 year after MI and continued through January 2022. Crude risks of mortality, cardiovascular events, and bleeding were estimated in consecutive 3-year periods. Standardized risks were calculated with respect to the distribution of age, sex, comorbidities, and treatments in the latter period. Guideline-recommended treatment use increased during the study period: e.g. statins (68.6–92.5%) and percutaneous coronary intervention (23.9–68.2%). The crude 5-year risks of outcomes decreased (all P-trend <0.001): Mortality, 18.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.9–19.2) to 12.5% (CI: 11.9–13.1); Recurrent MI, 7.5% (CI: 7.1–8.0) to 5.5% (CI: 5.1–6.0); Bleeding, 3.9% (CI: 3.6–4.3) to 2.7% (CI: 2.4–3.0). Crude 5-year risk of mortality in 2015–17 was as low as 2.6% for patients aged <60 years. Use of guideline-recommended treatments was associated with improved outcomes: After standardization for changes in treatments, 5-year risk of mortality in 2000–02 was 15.5% (CI: 14.9–16.2). Conclusions For patients who were event-free 1 year after MI, the long-term risks of mortality, cardiovascular events, and bleeding decreased significantly, along with an improved use of guideline-recommended treatments between 2000 and 2017. In the most recent period, 1 year after MI, the risk of additional events was lower than previously reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christensen et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (n=82,108). Recent time period (2015-2017) and guideline-recommended treatments vs. Historical time period (2000-2002) was evaluated on 5-year mortality (p=<0.001). Treatment in the most recent period (2015-2017) compared to 2000-2002 was associated with a reduction in 5-year mortality from 18.6% to 12.5% (P-trend <0.001) for patients stable 1 year post-MI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: