Why the study?
Mortality following a first-time myocardial infarction has declined, but disparities in treatment and outcomes among potentially vulnerable groups remain unclear.
Does belonging to a potentially vulnerable subgroup affect the initiation of guideline-recommended therapy and 5-year all-cause mortality in patients with first-time myocardial infarction over time?
Does belonging to a potentially vulnerable subgroup affect the initiation of guideline-recommended therapy and 5-year all-cause mortality in patients with first-time myocardial infarction over time?
Despite broad 20-year improvements in MI care and mortality in Denmark, significant treatment gaps and survival disparities persist among vulnerable populations, underscoring the need for targeted equity efforts.
Persistent gaps in MI treatment and mortality among vulnerable Danish subgroups warrant monitoring; leaves open whether targeted interventions reduce inequities.
Background: Mortality following a first-time myocardial infarction (MI) has declined, yet disparities in treatment and outcomes among potentially vulnerable groups remain unclear. We aimed to examine trends in treatment and mortality among first-time MI patients from 2003 to 2022 across eight potentially vulnerable subgroups in Denmark. Methods: Using Danish registries, patients with a first-time MI between 2003 and 2022 were identified and divided into five-year calendar groups and eight subgroups ('age ≥80', 'low income', 'female', 'frail', 'non-Western immigrant', 'history of mental illness', 'living alone', and 'living in a rural area'). Temporal trends in treatment initiation and mortality were assessed using Kaplan Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regression. Findings: Among 118,674 patients included, guideline-recommended therapy initiation increased over time, though gaps persisted (e.g. statin initiation in 2018-2022: 77.0% (2241/2911) among frail patients vs. 90.2% (19,986/22,157) among their counterparts). Crude and adjusted mortality rates declined for all subgroups over time, yet gaps persisted. Mortality remained highest among frail patients (5-year mortality risk of 48.7% [95% CI 46.5-50.9] in 2018-2022) and those aged ≥80 years (56.5% [95% CI 54.5-58.5]), no mortality difference was observed between patients living in rural areas and their counterparts (21.6% [95% CI 20.6-22.6] vs. 21.3% [95% CI 19.8-20.6] in 2018-2022), and non-Western immigrants exhibited lower mortality than their counterparts (8.8% [95% CI 7.0-10.6] vs. 21.3% [95% CI 20.7-22.0] in 2018-2022). Interpretation: Despite improvements from 2003 to 2022, persistent disparities underscore ongoing inequities and the need for targeted efforts to promote equity. Funding: None.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ødum et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: