Key result
3D mapping for AVNRT ablation is linked to ~43% fewer ablations near the successful site.
Why the study?
Avoiding excessively fast junctional rhythm during slow pathway modification for AVNRT helps prevent serious atrioventricular block, prompting evaluation of a predictive ablation point using 3D electroanatomical mapping.
Does using a predictive 3D mapping benchmark location marker improve procedural efficiency and safety during slow pathway ablation in patients with AVNRT?
Population
141 consecutive patients with common AVNRT receiving anatomical ablation to an antegrade slow pathway
Comparison
Ablation using a 3D predictive location marker vs ablation without it
Design
Single-center comparative cohort study
Authors
Loading...
May improve safety margins in AVNRT ablation; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Cohort (n=141)
No
Does using a predictive 3D mapping benchmark location marker improve procedural efficiency and safety during slow pathway ablation in patients with AVNRT?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.5% vs 11.4%
p-value: p=< .01
Using a predictive 3D mapping benchmark for slow pathway ablation in AVNRT reduces the number of required ablations and increases the distance from the His bundle, potentially improving procedural safety and efficiency.
Yamamoto et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (n=141). 3D mapping benchmark (location marker predicting successful ablation sites) vs. Conventional treatment without the location marker was evaluated on Number of ablations near the successful ablation point (p=< .01). Using a 3D mapping benchmark for AVNRT ablation significantly reduced the number of ablations near the successful ablation point compared to conventional treatment (6.5 vs 11.4, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: