Key result
An 8-mm ablation catheter with mini electrodes without 3D mapping achieved 100% acute procedural success, comparable to a conventional 8-mm catheter with 3D mapping, and provided additional diagnostic value in 23% of patients.
Why the study?
Does the use of mini electrodes in an 8-mm tip ablation catheter improve diagnostic value and procedural outcomes in patients undergoing CTI ablation compared to a standard 8-mm tip with 3D mapping?
Cohort (n=50)
No
Does the use of mini electrodes in an 8-mm tip ablation catheter improve diagnostic value and procedural outcomes in patients undergoing CTI ablation compared to a standard 8-mm tip with 3D mapping?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 100%
Mini electrodes in an 8-mm ablation tip provide additional diagnostic value in a small percentage of CTI ablation cases without compromising procedural efficiency even when omitting 3D mapping.
May add diagnostic value in CTI ablation without 3D mapping; leaves open superiority versus standard catheters in randomized trials.
Background: Eight-mm ablation catheters are widely used in cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTI) for treatment of right sided atrial flutter. However a high success rate, these large ablation tips comes with adisadvantage of lower resolution of fractionated signals. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional diagnostic value of the electrograms recordedfrom mini electrodes (MEs) in an 8-mm ablation catheter tip during CTI. Methods: CTI-ablation procedures were compared retrospectively in two groups, namely, group A: the Abbott Safire 8-mm tip with a 3D mapping system (n =37) and group B: the Boston Scientific MiFi IntellaTip XP 8-mm tip without a 3D mapping system (n=13). We analyzedacute procedural success, ablation characteristics and recurrence rate at one-year follow-up. Electrograms from MEs were analyzedright before the onset of the critical ablation application that resulted in acute CTI-block. We determined whether these ME electrograms had additional diagnostic value in addition to of the 8-mm tip derivedelectrogram. Results: At the onset of the critical ablation application, the MEs had an important additional value in 3 out of 13 cases as local signals were sensed on the MEs that were not recorded by the 8-mm tip electrode. In 2cases the ME did not show local electrogramsalthough the ablationwas still effective. Acute procedural and long-term success wereobserved in all patients. No differences were found in time to bidirectional block, procedure time or fluoroscopic exposure. Conclusion: Our data show that signals recorded from the MEs had additional diagnostic value, but only in asmall percentage of the patients. We did not observe, although omitting 3D-mapping in the ME group, any differencebetween groups with regard to procedural or ablation characteristicsduring CTI-ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniël Mol (2018) conducted a cohort in Typical Atrial Flutter (n=50). 8-mm ablation catheter with mini electrodes (MiFi IntellaTip XP) without 3D mapping vs. Conventional 8-mm ablation catheter (Safire F) with 3D mapping was evaluated on Acute procedural success. An 8-mm ablation catheter with mini electrodes without 3D mapping achieved 100% acute procedural success, comparable to a conventional 8-mm catheter with 3D mapping, and provided additional diagnostic value in 23% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: