Why the study?
Does voltage-directed CTI ablation using mini-electrodes improve procedural efficiency compared to conventional bipolar electrodes in patients with typical atrial flutter?
Does voltage-directed CTI ablation using mini-electrodes improve procedural efficiency compared to conventional bipolar electrodes in patients with typical atrial flutter?
Voltage-directed CTI ablation using mini-electrodes is not superior to conventional bipolar electrodes and may result in less efficient identification and ablation of conducting muscle bundles.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mini-electrode signals may aid voltage-directed CTI ablation; leaves open efficiency gains pending randomized confirmation.
Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation is a current first-line management method for typical atrial flutter. A voltage-directed technique that systematically targets points of maximal voltage has be found to reduce procedure and fluoroscopy times without increasing recurrence. We hypothesized that this technique's efficiency would be enhanced by using signals from radial minielectrodes of a novel catheter (IntellaTip MiFi™; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). Prospectively, atrial flutter patients underwent voltage-directed ablation with a nonirrigated 8-mm-tip catheter. Ablation was either directed by conventional bipolar electrodes (group A, n = 13) or mini-electrodes (group B, n = 17) with the goal of achieving bidirectional block at the CTI and a subsequent observation time of 30 minutes. Total radiofrequency application time and lesion numbers were not significantly different. Group B had a lower mean power [38.7 watts (W) ± 2.0 W versus 44.8 W ± 1.9 W; p < 0.05] and a tendency for longer fluoroscopy and procedure times. In three of the cases in group B, a switch to an irrigated catheter was required in order to achieve bidirectional block. In group A, bidirectional block was obtained in all patients using the nonirrigated catheter with no significant increase in reconnection. Differences in the catheter performance between the two groups were driven by poorer performance of the MiFi™ catheter (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) in patients presenting in atrial flutter. Electroanatomical mapping revealed a more proximal localization of the maximal voltage by the minielectrodes as compared with the conventional bipolar electrodes, resulting in less efficient identification and ablation of the conducting muscle bundles. Final results indicated CTI ablation using minielectrodes is not superior to conventional bipolar electrodes in the use of 8-mm, nonirrigated electrodes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Somani et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: