Key result
HF Supportive Care Service linked to ~78% fewer HF-related admission days.
Why the study?
Heart failure is associated with poor quality of life and high symptom burden, but the best model of palliative care for patients reaching ceilings of survival-extending interventions remains unestablished.
Does a Heart Failure Supportive Care Service improve patient experience and reduce hospital admissions in patients with advanced heart failure?
Observational (n=236)
Does a Heart Failure Supportive Care Service improve patient experience and reduce hospital admissions in patients with advanced heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 4% vs 18.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
A cospeciality cross-boundary palliative care service for advanced heart failure improves patient-reported outcomes, reduces hospital bed days, and delivers substantial cost savings.
OBJECTIVES: Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent condition associated with poor quality-of-life and high symptom burden. As patients reach ceilings of survival-extending interventions, their priorities may be more readily addressed through the support of palliative care services; however, the best model of care remains unestablished.We aimed to create and evaluate a cospeciality cross-boundary service model for patients with HF that better provides for their palliative care needs in the latter stages of life, while delivering a more cost-effective patient journey. METHODS: In 2016, the Heart Failure Supportive Care Service (HFSCS) was established to provide patient-centred holistic support to patients with advanced HF. Patient experience questionnaires were developed and distributed in mid-2018 and end-of-2020. Indexed hospital admission data (in-patient bed days pre-referral/post-referral) were used allowing statistical comparisons by paired t-tests. RESULTS: From 2016-2020, 236 patients were referred to the HFSCS. Overall, 75/118 questionnaires were returned. Patients felt that the HFSCS delivered compassionate care (84%) that improved symptoms and quality of life (80% and 65%). Introduction of the HFSCS resulted in a reduction in HF-related admissions: actual days 18.3 to 4 days (p<0.001), indexed days 0.05 to 0.032 days (p=0.03). Cost mapping revealed an estimated average saving of at least £10 218.36 per referral and a total estimated cost saving of approximately £2.4 million over 5 years. CONCLUSION: This service demonstrates that a cospeciality cross-boundary method of care delivery successfully provides the benefits of palliative care to patients with HF in a value-based manner, while meeting the priorities of care that matter to patients most.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atkinson et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Advanced heart failure (n=236). Heart Failure Supportive Care Service (HFSCS) vs. Pre-referral (historical self-control) was evaluated on Heart failure-related admissions (actual days) (p=<0.001). The Heart Failure Supportive Care Service reduced HF-related admission days from 18.3 pre-referral to 4 days post-referral (p<0.001), saving an estimated £10,218 per patient.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: