Why the study?
What is the diastolic flow velocity profile of clinically uncomplicated mitral porcine bioprostheses assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography?
What is the diastolic flow velocity profile of clinically uncomplicated mitral porcine bioprostheses assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography?
Clinically uncomplicated mitral porcine bioprostheses exhibit a diastolic flow profile resembling mild mitral stenosis on pulsed Doppler echocardiography, likely due to reduced orifice size or physical properties of the bioprosthesis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May mimic mild mitral stenosis on Doppler; leaves open whether bioprosthetic criteria require adjustment in surveillance.
Pulsed Doppler echocardiography was performed in 17 subjects who had clinically uncomplicated porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position. A positive initial diastolic flow wave was present in all patients; end-diastolic A waves were seen in the sinus rhythm of every patient. The peak of the diastolic wave was delayed when compared with the normals in our laboratory. This wave had clearly demarcated ascending, mid- and descending segments. When contrasted with normal subjects, the slope of the diastolic wave was mildly reduced in all patients. Fine to coarse indentations on the descending and mid-segments were seen in 15/17 (88%) of the patients. We conclude that the diastolic flow profile of the clinically uncomplicated mitral bioprosthesis resembles mild mitral stenosis. Reduced orifice size and/or the physical properties of the bioprosthesis are the likely mechanisms for these alterations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raizada et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: