What question did this study set out to answer?

Identify and recommend effective rating and self-rating methods to evaluate changes in distress among neurotic patients participating in pharmacotherapy trials.

February 1, 1972Psychological Medicine

Part 2. Improvement criteria in drug trials with neurotic patients

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Identify and recommend effective rating and self-rating methods to evaluate changes in distress among neurotic patients participating in pharmacotherapy trials.
Reviewed available clinical trial evidence evaluating tools for measuring changes in neurotic distress.
Assessed the utility of both clinician-administered rating scales and patient self-report instruments.
Identified several clinician-rated and self-rated measurement instruments suitable for tracking distress fluctuations qualitatively.
Established standard improvement criteria to optimize outcome evaluation in psychiatric clinical trials.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Evidence review reveals recommended rating and self-rating methods in neurotic patients, indicating standardized approaches to evaluate drug trial outcomes.

Cite This Study

Robert Kellner (1972) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10deb9acd1dbe064648ada https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700045645

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Evidence review reveals recommended rating and self-rating methods in neurotic patients, indicating standardized approaches to evaluate drug trial outcomes.

Part 2. Improvement criteria in drug trials with neurotic patients

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Part 2. Improvement criteria in drug trials with neurotic patients

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider