Key result
A 20-minute online course is linked to better cardiac rehab knowledge and encouragement practices among providers.
Why the study?
Health care providers should promote cardiac rehabilitation to patients face-to-face to increase enrollment, but an online course designed to promote this bedside practice required evaluation.
Does a 20-minute online course improve knowledge, self-efficacy, and practices regarding cardiac rehabilitation promotion among inpatient cardiac care providers?
Observational (n=522)
Yes
Does a 20-minute online course improve knowledge, self-efficacy, and practices regarding cardiac rehabilitation promotion among inpatient cardiac care providers?
p-value: p=<0.001
A brief, free online course effectively improves knowledge, self-efficacy, and encouragement practices for cardiac rehabilitation among inpatient cardiac care providers.
May support brief online training for inpatient providers; leaves open effects on referral rates and patient outcomes.
PURPOSE: Evidence proves that health care providers should promote cardiac rehabilitation (CR) to patients face-to-face to increase CR enrollment. An online course was designed to promote this at the bedside; it is evaluated herein in terms of reach, effect on knowledge, attitudes, discussion self-efficacy and practices, and satisfaction. METHODS: Design was observational, one-group pre- and post-test. Some demographics were requested from learners taking all language versions of the 20-min course: English, Portuguese, French, Spanish, and simplified Chinese, available at: https://globalcardiacrehab.com/CR-Utilization. Investigator-generated items in the pre- and post-test and evaluation survey administered using Google Forms were based on Kirkpatrick's training evaluation model. RESULTS: The course was initiated by 522 learners from 33 of 203 (16%) countries; most commonly female (n = 341, 65%) nurses (n = 180, 34%) from high-income countries (n = 259, 57%) completing the English (n = 296, 57%) and Chinese (n = 108, 21%) versions. A total of 414 (79%) learners completed the post-test and 302 (58%) completed the evaluation. Median CR attitudes were 5 of 5 on the Likert scale at pre-test, suggesting some selection bias. Mean CR knowledge ([7.22 ± 2.14]/10), discussion self-efficacy ([3.86 ± 0.85]/5), and practice ([4.13 ± 1.11]/5) significantly improved after completion of the course (all P < .001). Satisfaction was high regardless of language version ([4.44 ± 0.64]/5; P = .593). CONCLUSIONS: This free, open-access course is effective in increasing CR knowledge, self-efficacy, and encouragement practices among participating inpatient cardiac providers, with high satisfaction. While testing impact on actual CR use is needed, it should be more broadly disseminated to increase reach, in an effort to increase patient enrollment in CR, to reduce morbidity and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heald et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Health care providers promoting cardiac rehabilitation (n=522). Online course on promoting cardiac rehabilitation vs. Pre-course baseline was evaluated on Cardiac rehabilitation knowledge score (out of 10) (p=<0.001). A 20-minute online course significantly improved cardiac rehabilitation knowledge, discussion self-efficacy, and encouragement practices among inpatient cardiac care providers (all P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: