PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2006Blood Pressure14 citations

Assessment of self‐monitoring of blood pressure in the diagnosis of isolated clinic hypertension

View Full Paper
GTGabriel Coll de TueroQFQuintí Foguet‐BoreuARAntonio Rodríguez‐Poncelas

Structured PICO

Does self-blood pressure monitoring improve the diagnosis of isolated clinic hypertension and assessment of target organ damage in patients without prior cardiovascular events?

P
Population
135 new hypertensive and normotensive patients aged 15-75 years, without a history of cardiovascular events (95 hypertensive, 40 normotensive).
I
Intervention
Self-blood pressure monitoring (SBPM) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM)
C
Comparator
Clinical blood pressure measurement
O
Outcome
Target organ damage (TOD) including left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), retinopathy (exudates or haemorrhages), and microalbuminuriasurrogate

Self-blood pressure monitoring is valuable in diagnosing isolated clinic hypertension, which is associated with a relatively frequent occurrence of advanced retinopathy and target organ damage.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no studies assessing cardiovascular morbidity, morality in patients with isolated clinical hypertension (ICH) with self-blood pressure monitoring (SBPM). OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of SBPM in the diagnosis of ICH. METHODS: Cohort study. New hypertensive and normotensive patients 15-75 years, without cardiovascular events history. VARIABLES: Oriented anamnesis hypertension; blood pressure measurements (BP): clinical BP, SBPM and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM); evaluation of target organ damage (TOD); electrocardiogram; retinography and microalbuminuria (MA). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients, 95 hypertensive (62.1% males; mean age 59.08+/-16.8 years), 40 normotensive (37.5% males; mean are 56.32+/-10.22 years). BP measurements (mmHG) in normotensives vs hypertensives: clinical BP, 125.36/76.74 vs 149.81/87.86 mmHg (p0.10); SBPM: 147.895/88.95 vs 128.17/79 (p<0.0001) and ABPM, 141.72/88.22 vs 131.66/80 (p=0.053 for systolic). TOD in SH vs ICH: LVH, 24.6% vs 19.2% (p=0.814); exudates or haemorrhages, 7.7% vs 9.8% (p=0.580). The risk of an occurrence of any TOD in ICH patients is lower for 125/80 (OR=2.5). CONCLUSIONS: VAMPAHICA will provide information about value SBPM in the diagnosis of ICH. Advanced retinopathy is relative frequent in ICH patients. If TOD is accepted as a surrogate endpoint, the diagnostic values of ICH will be probably decreased.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tuero et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10e8ddf85e2d3f759f7320https://doi.org/10.1080/08037050600912203
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper