Key result
Cerebral protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation are reviewed regarding their efficacy and the unclear clinical significance of silent cerebral infarctions as surrogate outcomes.
Why the study?
Do cerebral protection devices reduce peri-procedural cerebral embolizations and stroke in patients undergoing TAVI?
Do cerebral protection devices reduce peri-procedural cerebral embolizations and stroke in patients undergoing TAVI?
This review summarizes the current evidence on cerebral protection devices during TAVI, highlighting that while they aim to reduce embolization, the clinical significance of reducing silent cerebral infarctions remains unclear.
Cerebral protection device use in TAVI warrants caution pending clinical endpoint trials; leaves open the surrogate validity of silent infarctions.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with aortic valve stenosis is associated with an improvement of clinical outcomes, quality of life, and self-sufficiency. The most feared TAVI-related complication is the occurrence of stroke. In order to reduce peri-procedural cerebral embolizations, diverse cerebral protection devices have been developed. These devices work though deflection or filtering of emboli, and are in different stages of testing. Silent cerebral infarctions identified by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) are used as surrogate primary outcomes, but the clinical significance is still unclear. This review provides a synopsis of the diverse cerebral protection devices and summarizes the current evidence on their efficacy during TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vlastra et al. (2018) conducted a review in Aortic valve stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Cerebral protection devices was evaluated. Cerebral protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation are reviewed regarding their efficacy and the unclear clinical significance of silent cerebral infarctions as surrogate outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: