Key result
STABLEPOINT local impedance drops below ~20 ohms linked to gap formation during PVI.
Why the study?
Local impedance parameters of the IntellaNav STABLEPOINT catheter for successful pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation remain unclear.
What are the optimal local impedance drop parameters for predicting successful pulmonary vein isolation during catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Population
102 consecutive AF patients undergoing catheter ablation at two centers
Comparison
Ablation points without conduction gaps vs with conduction gaps
Design
Two-center prospective operator-blinded observational study
Authors
Loading...
May inform real-time lesion assessment during PVI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding practice.
Observational (n=102)
Blinded to LI data
Yes
What are the optimal local impedance drop parameters for predicting successful pulmonary vein isolation during catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
An absolute local impedance drop of 20.0 ohms and a relative drop of 11.6% are optimal cutoffs for predicting successful pulmonary vein isolation during atrial fibrillation ablation.
Fukaya et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=102). IntellaNav STABLEPOINT catheter ablation vs. Unsuccessful ablation points (conduction gaps) was evaluated on Local impedance (LI) drop and %LI drop for successful lesion formation. An insufficient local impedance drop with STABLEPOINT was associated with gap formation during PVI, with optimal cutoff values for LI drop and %LI drop identified as 20.0 ohms and 11.6%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: