Key result
Leadless pacemakers show a ~27% five-year major complication rate despite maintaining stable pacing.
Why the study?
Real-world safety and efficacy of leadless pacemakers have been demonstrated up to 3 years, but longer-term data were warranted to evaluate the net clinical benefit of leadless pacing.
Does leadless pacemaker implantation provide long-term safety and efficacy in a real-world cohort?
Cohort (n=179)
Yes
Does leadless pacemaker implantation provide long-term safety and efficacy in a real-world cohort?
Leadless pacemakers demonstrate a low long-term major complication rate (excluding battery advisory issues) and stable pacing performance over a mean follow-up of 44 months.
BackgroundAdequate real-world safety and efficacy of leadless pacemakers (LPs) have been demonstrated up to 3 years after implantation. Longer-term data are warranted to assess the net clinical benefit of leadless pacing.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of LP therapy in a real-world cohort.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, all consecutive patients with a first LP implantation from December 21, 2012, to December 13, 2016, in 6 Dutch high-volume centers were included. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of major procedure- or device-related complications (ie, requiring surgery) at 5-year follow-up. Analyses were performed with and without Nanostim battery advisory-related complications. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients with a pacing capture threshold ≤2.0 V at implantation and without ≥1.5-V increase at the last follow-up visit.ResultsA total of 179 patients were included (mean age 79 ± 9 years), 93 (52%) with a Nanostim and 86 (48%) with a Micra VR LP. Mean follow-up duration was 44 ± 26 months. Forty-one major complications occurred, of which 7 were not advisory related. The 5-year major complication rate was 4% without advisory-related complications and 27% including advisory-related complications. No advisory-related major complications occurred a median 10 days (range 0–88 days) postimplantation. The pacing capture threshold was low in 163 of 167 patients (98%) and stable in 157 of 160 (98%).ConclusionThe long-term major complication rate without advisory-related complications was low with LPs. No complications occurred after the acute phase and no infections occurred, which may be a specific benefit of LPs. The performance was adequate with a stable pacing capture threshold. Adequate real-world safety and efficacy of leadless pacemakers (LPs) have been demonstrated up to 3 years after implantation. Longer-term data are warranted to assess the net clinical benefit of leadless pacing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of LP therapy in a real-world cohort. In this retrospective cohort study, all consecutive patients with a first LP implantation from December 21, 2012, to December 13, 2016, in 6 Dutch high-volume centers were included. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of major procedure- or device-related complications (ie, requiring surgery) at 5-year follow-up. Analyses were performed with and without Nanostim battery advisory-related complications. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients with a pacing capture threshold ≤2.0 V at implantation and without ≥1.5-V increase at the last follow-up visit. A total of 179 patients were included (mean age 79 ± 9 years), 93 (52%) with a Nanostim and 86 (48%) with a Micra VR LP. Mean follow-up duration was 44 ± 26 months. Forty-one major complications occurred, of which 7 were not advisory related. The 5-year major complication rate was 4% without advisory-related complications and 27% including advisory-related complications. No advisory-related major complications occurred a median 10 days (range 0–88 days) postimplantation. The pacing capture threshold was low in 163 of 167 patients (98%) and stable in 157 of 160 (98%). The long-term major complication rate without advisory-related complications was low with LPs. No complications occurred after the acute phase and no infections occurred, which may be a specific benefit of LPs. The performance was adequate with a stable pacing capture threshold.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Breeman et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in First leadless pacemaker implantation (n=179). Leadless pacemakers (Nanostim and Micra VR) was evaluated on Major procedure- or device-related complications at 5-year follow-up. Leadless pacemakers demonstrated a 5-year major complication rate of 27% (4% excluding battery advisory events) and maintained stable pacing capture thresholds in 98% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: