Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This exploration reveals how street renaming in St. Petersburg shaped cultural identity while implicating significant historical tensions.
Place renaming is an archetypical feature of regime change in (post-)Soviet Russia. In the case of Leningrad / St. Petersburg it is interpreted here as an attempt at temporal boundary-making: in renaming streets, local elites tried to erect a symbolic time border between ‘old’ and ‘new’. Since post-Soviet renaming mostly amounted to returning to places the maiden names they bore in the imperial period, toponymic changes since the perestroika did not imply a radically new semiotic mapping of the cityscape. In choosing memory landmarks for cultural self-identification that refer to an idealised European past, place-namers also tried to establish normative boundaries to situate St. Petersburg in a desired geopolitical space. Like other discursive constructions, these renaming processes are not free of contradictions however.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anaïs Marin (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: