Key result
A 3D-CNN model estimates cine-MRI LVEF with ~0.80 correlation but performs worse for RVEF.
Why the study?
Because short-axis cine-MRI depicts both ventricles, it was unclear which ventricular motion feature a 3D-CNN captures when estimating ejection fractions without manual tracing.
Does a 3D-CNN regression model accurately estimate left and right ventricular ejection fractions from cine-MRI without tracing?
Does a 3D-CNN regression model accurately estimate left and right ventricular ejection fractions from cine-MRI without tracing?
A 3D-CNN regression model can estimate left ventricular ejection fraction from cine-MRI more accurately than right ventricular ejection fraction, capturing left ventricular systolic function as a feature.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support automated LVEF estimation from cine-MRI; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Cardiac function indices must be calculated using tracing from short-axis images in cine-MRI. A 3D-CNN (convolutional neural network) that adds time series information to images can estimate cardiac function indices without tracing using images with known values and cardiac cycles as the input. Since the short-axis image depicts the left and right ventricles, it is unclear which motion feature is captured. This study aims to estimate the indices by learning the short-axis images and the known left and right ventricular ejection fractions and to confirm the accuracy and whether each index is captured as a feature. A total of 100 patients with publicly available short-axis cine images were used. The dataset was divided into training:test = 8:2, and a regression model was built by training with the 3D-ResNet50. Accuracy was assessed using a five-fold cross-validation. The correlation coefficient, MAE (mean absolute error), and RMSE (root mean squared error) were determined as indices of accuracy evaluation. The mean correlation coefficient of the left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.80, MAE was 9.41, and RMSE was 12.26. The mean correlation coefficient of the right ventricular ejection fraction was 0.56, MAE was 11.35, and RMSE was 14.95. The correlation coefficient was considerably higher for the left ventricular ejection fraction. Regression modeling using the 3D-CNN indicated that the left ventricular ejection fraction was estimated more accurately, and left ventricular systolic function was captured as a feature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inomata et al. (2023) studied Ventricular ejection fraction estimation (n=100). 3D-CNN (3D-ResNet50) regression model was evaluated on Correlation coefficient, MAE, and RMSE of estimated ejection fractions (LVEF correlation 0.80; RVEF correlation 0.56). A 3D-CNN regression model estimated left ventricular ejection fraction from cine-MRI with a mean correlation coefficient of 0.80, which was considerably higher than for the right ventricle (0.56).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: