Key result
Macaque brains exhibit ~2.8 million A-I RNA editing sites enriched in neurotransmitter receptor genes.
Why the study?
The roles of adenosine-to-inosine (A-I) RNA editing in the evolution and functions of primate brains are underexplored.
Primates exhibit higher levels of A-I RNA editing in the brain compared to other mammals, particularly in genes related to neurotransmission, highlighting its evolutionary importance.
May guide primate brain evolution research; leaves open human neurological relevance.
Adenosine-to-inosine (A-I) RNA editing is one of the most abundant post-transcriptional RNA modification processes. However, the roles of A-I RNA editing in the evolution and functions of primate brains are underexplored. Here, we perform whole-genome and whole-transcriptome sequencing of 39 anatomically defined brain regions of adult Macaca fascicularis and identify 2 782 079 A-I editing sites, including 2009 recoding sites enriched in genes related to neurotransmission functions. Most of macaque brain A-I editing sites are detected in the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and amygdala. The brain A-I editing activity is associated with the estimated proportion of neurons to some extent. Comparison of A-I editing in mouse, pig, macaque, and human brains reveals that primates exhibit higher editing levels, specifically enriched in genes encoding neurotransmitter receptors. We identify 478 598 conserved brain editing sites between human and macaque brains, mostly found in the cerebral cortex and enriched in genes related to the cytoskeletal system and ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation pathway. Our study sheds light on the importance of post-transcriptional A-I RNA editing in the evolution and function of nervous systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied A-I RNA editing in mammalian brains. Whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing identified 2,782,079 A-I editing sites in macaque brains, with primates exhibiting higher editing levels enriched in neurotransmitter receptor genes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: