Key result
Exercise training boosts peak VO2 by ~21% vs usual care in older HFpEF patients.
Why the study?
Most reports on exercise training in HFpEF focus on European and American patients, with limited data regarding its effects on cardiac function, hemodynamics, and exercise capacity in East Asian patients.
Does aerobic exercise and strength training improve peak oxygen uptake in Japanese patients aged 65-80 years with HFpEF?
Does aerobic exercise and strength training improve peak oxygen uptake in Japanese patients aged 65-80 years with HFpEF?
Effect estimate: Mean difference -20.6% (95% CI -23.4% to -17.9%)
Absolute Event Rate: 8.3% vs -12.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
Exercise training significantly improves peak oxygen uptake and hemodynamics in older Japanese patients with HFpEF, though comorbid diabetes mellitus may attenuate these benefits.
May support exercise training to raise peakVO2 in older Japanese HFpEF; hypothesis-generating pending RCTs.
Introduction Exercise training is an established intervention method for improving exercise capacity and survival rates in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, most reports have focused on European and American patients, with limited data regarding the effects of exercise training on cardiac function, hemodynamics, and exercise capacity in East Asian patients. This study investigated the effects of exercise training on cardiac function, hemodynamics, and exercise capacity in Japanese patients aged 65–80 years with HFpEF. Methods This single-center, open-label, non-randomized, controlled trial prospectively enrolled 99 outpatients. Eligibility criteria for HFpEF patients were an HFA score ≥5 in addition to clinical symptoms of heart failure and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Exercise training in the intervention group consisted of aerobic exercise and strength training thrice weekly for 5 months. Patients in the control group continued the usual treatment for 5 months. Resting cardiac function was evaluated using echocardiography. Peak oxygen uptake (peakVO 2 ), ventilatory equivalent (VE) vs. carbon dioxide output (VCO 2 ) slope, peak cardiac output index, and arteriovenous oxygen difference were calculated using cardiopulmonary exercise testing combined with impedance cardiography. Results After 5 months of exercise training, remarkable interactions were observed, with peakVO 2 as the primary outcome. Additionally, significant interactions were observed between hemodynamic indices and some echocardiographic parameters. The mean percentage change in peakVO 2 from baseline was 8.3% in the intervention group. Fifteen study participants (30.1%) in the intervention group achieved a clinically meaningful change of 3.0 ml/min/kg (10% improvement) in peakVO 2 from baseline. The group with 3.0 ml/min/kg or 10% improvement in peakVO 2 from baseline had a considerably lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus and VE vs. VCO 2 slope and considerably higher left atrial-global longitudinal strain values than the group without any notable improvements. Conclusions Although exercise training can help improve exercise intolerance in Japanese patients aged 65–80 years with HFpEF, its benefits are limited. Our results suggest that HFpEF, complicated by diabetes mellitus and decreased ventilatory efficiency during exercise, may require reconsideration of intervention strategies. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network, a trial registry in Japan (registration number: UMIN000045474).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugita et al. (2023) studied Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=99). Exercise training (aerobic and strength) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Percentage change in peak oxygen uptake (peakVO2) from baseline (Mean difference -20.6%, 95% CI -23.4% to -17.9%, p=<0.001). Exercise training for 5 months significantly improved peak oxygen uptake by a mean difference of 20.6% compared to usual care in older Japanese patients with HFpEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: