Key result
Sitagliptin slows carotid IMT progression by ~0.23 mm vs conventional therapy in hyperuricemic T2DM.
Why the study?
Sitagliptin failed to slow carotid intima-media thickness progression versus conventional therapy in the PROLOGUE study, prompting evaluation of its effects in subgroups with or without hyperuricemia.
Does sitagliptin added therapy reduce the progression of carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hyperuricemia?
RCT (n=442)
randomized
Does sitagliptin added therapy reduce the progression of carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hyperuricemia?
Effect estimate: difference -0.233 mm (95% CI -0.419 to 0.046)
p-value: p=0.015
Sitagliptin may attenuate the progression of carotid intima-media thickness compared to conventional therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and hyperuricemia.
May slow carotid IMT progression in T2DM with hyperuricemia; hypothesis-generating pending randomized outcome trials.
Background and Aims: Studies have shown that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DDP-4) inhibitors have anti-atherosclerotic effects. However, in the PROLOGUE study, sitagliptin failed to slow the progression of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) relative to conventional therapy. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the PROLOGUE study and compared the effects of sitagliptin and conventional therapy on changes in CIMT in subgroups with or without hyperuricemia. Methods: The PROLOGUE study was a randomized controlled trial of 442 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients were randomized to receive sitagliptin added therapy or conventional therapy. Based on the serum uric acid levels of all study populations in the PROLOGUE study, we divided them into hyperuricemia subgroup ( n = 104) and non-hyperuricemia subgroup ( n = 331). The primary outcome was changed in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) parameters compared with baseline during the 24 months treatment period. Results: In the hyperuricemia subgroup, compared with the conventional therapy group, the changes in the mean internal carotid artery (ICA)-IMT and max ICA-IMT at 24 months were significantly lower in the sitagliptin group [−0.233 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) (−0.419 to 0.046), p = 0.015 and −0.325 mm, 95% CI (−0.583 to −0.068), p = 0.014], although there was no significant difference in the common carotid artery CIMT. Conclusion: The results of our analysis indicated that sitagliptin attenuated the progression of CIMT than conventional therapy in T2DM and hyperuricemia patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hyperuricemia (n=442). sitagliptin vs. conventional therapy was evaluated on changes in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) parameters compared with baseline (difference -0.233 mm, 95% CI -0.419 to 0.046, p=0.015). Sitagliptin significantly attenuated the progression of mean internal carotid artery IMT compared to conventional therapy in T2DM patients with hyperuricemia (difference -0.233 mm; P=0.015).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: