Key result
Sitagliptin attenuates carotid IMT progression vs conventional treatment.
Why the study?
Does sitagliptin reduce the progression of carotid intima-media thickening in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=282)
open-label, blinded end point
randomized
Yes
Does sitagliptin reduce the progression of carotid intima-media thickening in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes?
Sitagliptin attenuated the progression of carotid intima-media thickness compared to conventional treatment in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes without apparent cardiovascular disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports sitagliptin to slow carotid atherosclerosis progression in insulin-treated T2D without CVD; extends DPP-4 inhibitor data on vascular surrogates.
OBJECTIVE: The effect of additional treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents on the progression of atherosclerosis remains unknown in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We assessed the effects of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, on carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in T2DM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, multicenter, parallel-group, comparative study included 282 insulin-treated patients with T2DM free of a history of apparent cardiovascular diseases who were recruited at 12 clinical units and randomly allocated to either the sitagliptin group (n = 142) or the control group (n = 140). The primary outcomes were changes in mean and maximum IMT of the common carotid artery measured by echography at the end of a 104-week treatment period. RESULTS: Sitagliptin had a more potent glucose-lowering effect compared with the conventional treatment (-0.5 ± 1.0% vs. -0.2 ± 0.9%; P = 0.004), without increasing hypoglycemic episodes or body weight. Changes in the mean and left maximum IMT, but not right maximum IMT, of the common carotid arteries were significantly greater after sitagliptin treatment compared with conventional treatment (-0.029 [SE 0.013] vs. 0.024 [0.013] mm [P = 0.005]; -0.065 [0.027] vs. 0.022 [0.026] mm [P = 0.021]; -0.007 [0.031] vs. 0.027 [0.031] mm [P = 0.45], respectively). Over 104 weeks, sitagliptin, but not conventional treatment, significantly reduced the mean IMT and left maximum IMT of common carotid arteries relative to the baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin attenuated the progression of carotid IMT in insulin-treated patients with T2DM free of apparent cardiovascular disease compared with conventional treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mita et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=282). Sitagliptin vs. Conventional treatment was evaluated on Changes in mean and maximum IMT of the common carotid artery (p=0.005). Sitagliptin attenuated the progression of mean carotid intima-media thickness compared with conventional treatment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: