Key result
A review of left-ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction highlights unsolved issues including the lack of diagnostic criteria, unclear pathogenesis, and optimal therapy.
This review highlights the significant unmet needs in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of left-ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction, calling for further research to optimize patient care.
Lack of diagnostic criteria and therapies warrants clinical caution in LV hypertrabeculation; leaves open pathogenesis and management questions.
INTRODUCTION: Left-ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction (LVHT) is a rare myocardial abnormality of the distal left ventricular myocardium, which may be complicated by functional abnormalities such as heart failure, arrhythmias, or thrombus formation. AREA COVERED: This review discusses unsolved issues concerning LVHT, such as the lack of uniformly accepted diagnostic criteria, the unclear pathogenesis of LVHT, the relevance of clinical manifestations of LVHT as prognostic factors, the unclear association between LVHT and neuromuscular disorders, and the question which therapy LVHT patients should receive. Expert commentary: Despite controversy about these unsolved issues, there is consensus, however, that investigations need to be encouraged and undertaken which address the many open questions. This may help to prevent misdiagnosing or overdiagnosing LVHT, clarify etiology and pathomechanisms of LVHT, estimate the prognosis and outcome of these patients, identify the relevance of the association with certain neuromuscular disorders, chromosomal defects, and mutations, and to provide the optimal treatment and care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stöllberger et al. (2016) conducted a review in Left-ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction (LVHT). A review of left-ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction highlights unsolved issues including the lack of diagnostic criteria, unclear pathogenesis, and optimal therapy.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: