Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
International students, particularly in U.S. STEM graduate programs, often rely on artificial intelligence (AI) for translation, grammar, and writing aid. These programs have historically seen low female representation, reflecting a global gender gap in STEM education and technology usage due to systemic inequities. This study explores gender-based differences in AI-related dimensions and their impact on international students’ learning experience. Using Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA), we examined AI awareness, usage, perceptions, and education as predictors of positive learning outcomes. Surveying 422 Indian STEM students at a southeastern university, we found no gender-based differences across AI categories. Except for AI awareness, which proved a poor predictor for both genders, all other AI-related dimensions emerged as significantly necessary for higher learning experiences. These findings challenge existing research on the digital gender gap, offering implications for faculty and higher education administrators. We also discuss study limitations and propose future research directions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: